Two distinguished economists consider in the article below some of the major economic and human costs for the U.S. of the "wars" in Iraq and Afghanistan. With respect to human costs, they focus on the large number of U.S. casualties, not only those who are killed and wounded, but also the troops who suffer from life-long physical and mental disabilities.
They do not take into account the affects on the families of these soldiers. In the film Rethinking Afghanistan, there are examples of wives and mothers of injured soldiers who must give up paid jobs in order to look after their wounded sons or daughters. They also do not take into account how the wars have affected the Afghan people or the Iraq people, the destruction of their economies and infrastructure, the large number of deaths from the wars, the huge number of refugees, the high rates of unemployment, poverty, devastated education, health care, and housing systems. Nonetheless, Stiglitz and Bilmes do us a service by systematically estimating the costs of the wars for the soldiers, implicitly their families, and the economic costs. They estimate that the U.S. has already spent one trillion dollars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The figure will climb to $3 trillion over the next 8 years. A good part of these expenditures are passed by Congress as "emergency supplemental appropriations" that get little scrutiny.
Our group, Stop Afghan War, have identified many reasons for opposing an escalation of troops and a withdrawal of the troops that are already in Afghan (and Iraq as well). Stiglitz and Bilmes add to this list.
Bob Sheak, November 10, 2009
They do not take into account the affects on the families of these soldiers. In the film Rethinking Afghanistan, there are examples of wives and mothers of injured soldiers who must give up paid jobs in order to look after their wounded sons or daughters. They also do not take into account how the wars have affected the Afghan people or the Iraq people, the destruction of their economies and infrastructure, the large number of deaths from the wars, the huge number of refugees, the high rates of unemployment, poverty, devastated education, health care, and housing systems. Nonetheless, Stiglitz and Bilmes do us a service by systematically estimating the costs of the wars for the soldiers, implicitly their families, and the economic costs. They estimate that the U.S. has already spent one trillion dollars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The figure will climb to $3 trillion over the next 8 years. A good part of these expenditures are passed by Congress as "emergency supplemental appropriations" that get little scrutiny.
Our group, Stop Afghan War, have identified many reasons for opposing an escalation of troops and a withdrawal of the troops that are already in Afghan (and Iraq as well). Stiglitz and Bilmes add to this list.
Bob Sheak, November 10, 2009
Published on Tuesday, July 7, 2009 by The Capital Times (Wisconsin)
Adding Up the True Costs of Two Wars
by Joseph Stiglitz & Linda Bilmes
Last week the U.S. "stood down" in Iraq, finalizing the pullout of 140,000 troops from Iraqi cities and towns -- the first step on the long path home. After more than six years, most Americans are war-weary, even though a smaller percentage of us have been involved in the actual fighting than in any major conflict in U.S. history.
But not so fast. The conflict that began in 2003 is far from over for us, and the next chapter -- confronting a Taliban that reasserted itself in Afghanistan while the U.S. was sidetracked in Iraq -- will be expensive and bloody. The death toll for U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan reached 5,000 in June. An additional 80,000 Americans have been wounded or injured since the war in Iraq began. More than 300,000 of our troops have required medical treatment, and Army statistics show that more than 17 percent of our returning soldiers suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder.
Meanwhile, in Iraq, even though most of the population has long told pollsters they can't wait for U.S. forces to leave, U.S. officials have said we are likely to station 50,000 troops at military bases in the country for the foreseeable future. This is because the situation in Iraq is highly precarious.
Moreover, the U.S. barely has begun to face the enormous financial bill for the war. By our accounting, the U.S. has already spent $1 trillion on operations and related defense spending, with more to come -- and it will cost perhaps $2 trillion more to repay the war debt, replenish military equipment and provide care and treatment for U.S. veterans back home. Many of the wounded will require indefinite care for brain and spinal injuries. Disability payments are ramping up and will grow higher for decades. The stress of extended, multiple tours to Iraq means that a whole generation of U.S. military men and women may now be suffering from long-term mental health issues. The suicide rate in the Army is at its highest level since record-keeping began.
This wartime spending undoubtedly has been a major contributor to our present economic collapse. The U.S. has waged an expensive war as if it required little or no economic sacrifice, funding the conflict by massive borrowing. As we've observed in the past, you can't spend $3 trillion on a reckless foreign war and not feel the pain at home.
Burned by the difficulties in Iraq, our political leaders have no illusions about the length and difficulty of the challenge facing us in Afghanistan. But in other respects we seem set to repeat the same mistakes that we made in Iraq. The president has just signed yet another "emergency" supplemental appropriations measure ($80 billion) to fund continuing operations in Iraq and expansion into Afghanistan. This means that for the 30th time since 2001, war spending has been rushed through the budget process without serious scrutiny.
Obstacles continue to beset returning veterans too. Despite an increase in the Department of Veterans Affairs budget, the backlog of disability claims has reached its highest level.
Early this year, President Barack Obama committed 20,000 troops to a "surge" in Afghanistan. That, combined with a large, ongoing presence in Iraq and continued reliance on private contractors for virtually every aspect of military support, remains a recipe for staggering out-of-control expenditures. Surely we can draw some lessons from the Iraq debacle and set aside money to care for our veterans, crack down on fraud and profiteering, and account for the true costs of the war in the budget so the American taxpayer can see what we are paying for.
Linda J. Bilmes of Harvard University is a former assistant secretary of Commerce. Joseph Stiglitz of Columbia University is a winner of the Nobel Prize in economics and a former chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors. They are the co-authors of "The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict [1]."
Article printed from www.CommonDreams.orgURL to article: http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/07/07-7
Adding Up the True Costs of Two Wars
by Joseph Stiglitz & Linda Bilmes
Last week the U.S. "stood down" in Iraq, finalizing the pullout of 140,000 troops from Iraqi cities and towns -- the first step on the long path home. After more than six years, most Americans are war-weary, even though a smaller percentage of us have been involved in the actual fighting than in any major conflict in U.S. history.
But not so fast. The conflict that began in 2003 is far from over for us, and the next chapter -- confronting a Taliban that reasserted itself in Afghanistan while the U.S. was sidetracked in Iraq -- will be expensive and bloody. The death toll for U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan reached 5,000 in June. An additional 80,000 Americans have been wounded or injured since the war in Iraq began. More than 300,000 of our troops have required medical treatment, and Army statistics show that more than 17 percent of our returning soldiers suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder.
Meanwhile, in Iraq, even though most of the population has long told pollsters they can't wait for U.S. forces to leave, U.S. officials have said we are likely to station 50,000 troops at military bases in the country for the foreseeable future. This is because the situation in Iraq is highly precarious.
Moreover, the U.S. barely has begun to face the enormous financial bill for the war. By our accounting, the U.S. has already spent $1 trillion on operations and related defense spending, with more to come -- and it will cost perhaps $2 trillion more to repay the war debt, replenish military equipment and provide care and treatment for U.S. veterans back home. Many of the wounded will require indefinite care for brain and spinal injuries. Disability payments are ramping up and will grow higher for decades. The stress of extended, multiple tours to Iraq means that a whole generation of U.S. military men and women may now be suffering from long-term mental health issues. The suicide rate in the Army is at its highest level since record-keeping began.
This wartime spending undoubtedly has been a major contributor to our present economic collapse. The U.S. has waged an expensive war as if it required little or no economic sacrifice, funding the conflict by massive borrowing. As we've observed in the past, you can't spend $3 trillion on a reckless foreign war and not feel the pain at home.
Burned by the difficulties in Iraq, our political leaders have no illusions about the length and difficulty of the challenge facing us in Afghanistan. But in other respects we seem set to repeat the same mistakes that we made in Iraq. The president has just signed yet another "emergency" supplemental appropriations measure ($80 billion) to fund continuing operations in Iraq and expansion into Afghanistan. This means that for the 30th time since 2001, war spending has been rushed through the budget process without serious scrutiny.
Obstacles continue to beset returning veterans too. Despite an increase in the Department of Veterans Affairs budget, the backlog of disability claims has reached its highest level.
Early this year, President Barack Obama committed 20,000 troops to a "surge" in Afghanistan. That, combined with a large, ongoing presence in Iraq and continued reliance on private contractors for virtually every aspect of military support, remains a recipe for staggering out-of-control expenditures. Surely we can draw some lessons from the Iraq debacle and set aside money to care for our veterans, crack down on fraud and profiteering, and account for the true costs of the war in the budget so the American taxpayer can see what we are paying for.
Linda J. Bilmes of Harvard University is a former assistant secretary of Commerce. Joseph Stiglitz of Columbia University is a winner of the Nobel Prize in economics and a former chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors. They are the co-authors of "The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict [1]."
Article printed from www.CommonDreams.orgURL to article: http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/07/07-7
No comments:
Post a Comment